Footnotes (153)



Treating Tribes Differently: Civil Jurisdiction Inside and Outside Indian Country

Max Minzner

University of New Mexico School of Law

October 1, 2005

Nevada Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 85, 2005

Indian tribes, and Indian tribal courts, vary substantially across the United States. Despite these differences, all tribal courts have (and lack) the same jurisdiction. The Supreme Court has treated all tribal courts as different from state courts, and at the same time, all tribal courts as identical to each other.

This Article attempts to analyze why, in the current jurisdictional framework, tribes are treated differently from states but not differently from each other. Two assumptions by the Supreme Court have led to this outcome. First, the Supreme Court has assumed tribal courts are fragile and are threatened by state court concurrent jurisdiction. The Court has suggested that, if given the choice, forum-shopping litigants (particularly non-tribal members) will turn to state courts, undermining tribal court jurisdiction. Second, the Supreme Court has assumed that the non-Indian litigants will generally be disadvantaged in tribal courts, and as such need protection from the exercise of tribal jurisdiction.

This Article these assumptions are flawed and that the actual nature and texture of the tribal court at issue should shape the scope of tribal jurisdiction. When tribes have in fact established courts that are fundamentally different from state courts, an exclusive jurisdiction model may be appropriate, but when tribes have adopted courts that mimic state courts, tribes should have the option of a concurrent jurisdiction model, with the state and the tribe sharing jurisdiction over all disputes involving tribal members and non-tribal members alike.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 1, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Minzner, Max, Treating Tribes Differently: Civil Jurisdiction Inside and Outside Indian Country (October 1, 2005). Nevada Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 85, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1153098

Contact Information

Max Minzner (Contact Author)
University of New Mexico School of Law ( email )
1117 Stanford, N.E.
Albuquerque, NM 87131
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,230
Downloads: 85
Download Rank: 223,154
Footnotes:  153

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.516 seconds