|
||||
|
||||
When is a Willful Breach 'Willful'? The Link Between Definitions and DamagesRichard CraswellStanford Law School October 20, 2008 Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1153169 Michigan Law Review, Vol. 107, 2009 Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 362 Abstract: The existing literature on willful breach has not been able to define what should count as "willful." I argue here that any definition we adopt has implications for just how high damages should be raised in those cases where a breach qualifies as willful. As a result, both of these issues -- the definition of "willful," and the measure of damages for willful breach -- need to be considered simultaneously. Specifically, if a definition of "willful" excludes all breachers who behaved efficiently, then in theory we can raise the penalty on the remaining inefficient breachers to any arbitrarily high level ("throw the book at them"). But if, instead, a given definition of willful would catch even some efficient breachers in its net, the damages assessed against willful breachers should be more limited. In that case, damages for willful breach might still justifiably be raised, but they should be raised only to the level that is economically efficient.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24 Keywords: contract, breach, remedies, damages, penalties, negligence, strict liability JEL Classification: K12, K13 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 1, 2008 ; Last revised: October 23, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.391 seconds