Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1153661
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (73)



 


 



The New Substantive Test in the EC Merger Regulation - Bridging the Gap between Economics and Law?


Giorgio Monti


European University Institute - Department of Law (LAW); European University Institute

July 30, 2008

LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 10/2008

Abstract:     
The 2004 EC Merger Regulation (ECMR) adopted the substantial impediment of effective competition test, and abandoned the earlier standard that required proof of dominance as a necessary element to intervene in a merger. It is said that this reform was necessary because the dominance test failed to catch unilateral effects absent dominance, so there was a 'gap' in the ECMR. This paper argues that the decision to amend the ECMR was unnecessary. From an economic perspective because the dominance standard was sufficiently flexible to address all anticompetitive mergers. Economists' concerns about merger control (in both the US and EC) was that authorities focused on a structural assessment premised upon market definition and market concentration and failed to give sufficient attention to other means to test for anticompetitive effects in a more direct manner. Economists' support for the new test is that it would place a focus on these other methods for identifying anticompetitive effects. From a legal perspective, it seems that the major motivation for reform was to divorce merger control from the abuse of dominance doctrine in Article 82, so that the two legal provisions would develop independently, the latter only applicable to manifestations of significant market power. Accordingly the view that there was a 'gap' in the dominance test is inaccurate, and lawyers and economists supported the reform for different reasons. This misunderstanding might explain why the Horizontal Merger Guidelines designed to indicate how the new standard applies are insufficiently precise. In an endeavour to offer some precision, the paper reviews a number of decisions and suggests that the Commission applies four distinct theories of harm, but the first major decision applying the new standard is worrying because the Commission appears to regulate the market rather than remove an impediment of competition caused by the merger, with the risk that the new standard is so loose that it allows the Commission to address questions of industrial policy through the ECMR.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 30, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Monti, Giorgio, The New Substantive Test in the EC Merger Regulation - Bridging the Gap between Economics and Law? (July 30, 2008). LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 10/2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1153661 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1153661

Contact Information

Giorgio Monti (Contact Author)
European University Institute - Department of Law (LAW) ( email )
Via Boccaccio 121 (Villa Schifanoia)
I-50122 Firenze
Italy
European University Institute ( email )
Via dei Roccettini 9
via delle Fontanelle 10
50016 San Domenico di Fiesole, Florence 50014
Italy
HOME PAGE: http://www.eui.eu/DepartmentsAndCentres/Law/People/Professors/Monti.aspx
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,878
Downloads: 693
Download Rank: 19,563
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  73

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.266 seconds