People v. Nelson: A Tale of Two Statistics

David H. Kaye

Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Law

July 4, 2008

Law, Probability, and Risk, Vol. 7, No. 3, September 2008

In recent years, defendants who were identified as a result of a search through a database of DNA profiles have argued that the probability that a randomly selected person would match a crime-scene stain overstates the probative value of the match. The statistical literature is divided, with most statisticians who have written on the subject rejecting this claim. In People v. Nelson, the Supreme Court of California held that when the random-match probability is so small as to make it exceedingly unlikely that any unrelated individual has the incriminating DNA profile, this statistic is admissible in a database-search case. In dicta, the court suggested that the defendant might be permitted to introduce an inflated match probability to counter the prosecution's statistic. This Comment describes the statistical issue, questions some of the reasoning in Nelson, and suggests other approaches that a defendant might take in response to a cold hit in the database.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: evidence, probative value, likelihood, probability, random match, database trawl, DNA profiling, np rule, Bayes' rule

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 6, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Kaye, David H., People v. Nelson: A Tale of Two Statistics (July 4, 2008). Law, Probability, and Risk, Vol. 7, No. 3, September 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1155546

Contact Information

David H. Kaye (Contact Author)
Pennsylvania State University, Penn State Law ( email )
Lewis Katz Building
University Park, PA 16802
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,677
Downloads: 328
Download Rank: 67,622

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds