Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1156917
 
 

Citations



 


 



Checks and Choices: The House Bank Scandal's Impact on Voters in 1992


Michael A. Dimock


University of California, San Diego (UCSD)

Gary C. Jacobson


University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - Department of Political Science

November 1995


Abstract:     
Analysis of the 1992 American National Election Study (ANES) data indicates that the House bank scandal reduced the vote for House incumbents by approximately five percentage points. The scandal mainly affected the small subset of voters who were most offended by bank overdrafts and who did not assume that their representative had a clean record. Fortunately for members who had written bad checks, voters who knew about the transgression were least disposed to be outraged by it, while the voters most disposed to outrage were also most inclined to believe the guilty were innocent. The explanation for these curious patterns is that voters who faced the option of condemning an incumbent they otherwise appreciated or dismissing the offense as inconsequential often chose the latter course. The damage was also moderated by partisanship; voters of the incumbent's party showed a strong tendency to err in the incumbent's favor in assessing involvement in the scandal. The classical theory of cognitive dissonance readily explains both phenomena.

working papers series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: July 8, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Dimock, Michael A. and Jacobson, Gary C., Checks and Choices: The House Bank Scandal's Impact on Voters in 1992 (November 1995). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1156917

Contact Information

Michael A. Dimock
University of California, San Diego (UCSD)
9500 Gilman Drive
Mail Code 0502
La Jolla, CA 92093-0112
United States
Gary C. Jacobson (Contact Author)
University of California, San Diego (UCSD) - Department of Political Science ( email )
9500 Gilman Drive
Code 0521
La Jolla, CA 92093-0521
United States
858-534-4295 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 564

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds