Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1158585
 
 

Footnotes (168)



 


 



Disaster-Specific Mechanisms for Consolidation


Robin Effron


Brooklyn Law School


Tulane Law Review, Forthcoming
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 110

Abstract:     
Within the past decade, two large scale catastrophes - the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and Hurricanes Katrina and Rita - have been the recent laboratories of new congressional provisions for the federalization and aggregation of mass tort claims. In the case of September 11, the litigation has been shaped by the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act (ATSSSA) an aggregation device that Congress devised specifically to address that particular catastrophe.

The Hurricane Katrina litigation has seen the use (and attempted use) of the Multiparty, Multiforum Trial Jurisdiction Act (MMTJA), an event jurisdiction device of general application that Congress established in 2002. This article explores three aspects of post-catastrophe litigation where the consolidation of cases, or the statutes that govern the consolidation of such cases, raise issues about how to think about disaster litigation as a singular category. After providing a brief summary of the paths of the September 11th and Canal Breach litigations, this article demonstrates that when the boundaries of federal jurisdiction are shaped by reference to events, this affects how cases may be consolidated, particularly with respect to Congress's degree of specificity in naming an event as the organizing principle of jurisdiction. These two federal statutes challenge courts to consider how closely, as a matter of law, federal jurisdiction based on the ATSSSA and the MMTJA and the consolidation of cases must be linked under these respective statutes. The article then turns to a discussion of the role that courts of appeals play in determining the boundaries of federal jurisdiction and consolidation for disaster litigation. The article ends with a discussion of the practical and administrative concerns of consolidated disaster litigation. I argue that the September 11th and Canal Breach litigations show that there can be a problem for judges and litigants of sorting common from uncommon issues in the context of a district-wide consolidation organized around an event.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: civil procedure, federal courts, september 11, hurricane Katrina, complex litigation, multidistrict litigation, jurisdiction, mass torts, toxic torts, aviation, environmental litigation, federal appellate jurisdiction

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: July 14, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Effron, Robin, Disaster-Specific Mechanisms for Consolidation. Tulane Law Review, Forthcoming; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 110. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1158585

Contact Information

Robin Effron (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 796
Downloads: 75
Download Rank: 193,793
Footnotes:  168

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.297 seconds