Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1158636
 
 

Footnotes (338)



 


 



The Supreme Common Law Court of the United States


Jack Michael Beermann


Boston University School of Law

July 11, 2008

Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 09-03

Abstract:     
The U.S. Supreme Court's primary role in the history of the United States, especially in constitutional cases (and cases hovering in the universe of the Constitution), has been to limit Congress's ability to redefine and redistribute rights in a direction most people would characterize as liberal. In other words, the Supreme Court, for most of the history of the United States since the adoption of the Constitution, has been a conservative force against change and redistribution. The Court has used five distinct devices to advance its control over the law. First, it has construed rights-creating constitutional provisions narrowly when those provisions are advanced by minorities and other disadvantaged groups. Second, it has construed Congress's power to create rights narrowly, holding unconstitutional many efforts by Congress to either expand the rights of minorities and other disadvantaged groups, or to create new rights for such people. Third, the Court has construed civil rights statutes narrowly, often provoking legislative responses by Congress. Fourth, the Court has construed some constitutional provisions broadly in order to take control of areas of the law that had been thought of as within the control of the states. Fifth, the Court has expanded the scope of federal preemption of state law which results in reducing the sphere governed by state common law. While these devices do not all necessarily result in taking the law in a conservative direction, by and large that has been the use to which the Court has put them.

One way in which the Court has advanced its agenda is by seizing power that, under federalism traditions, belong to state courts and state legislature. In several senses, the Supreme Court has begun to function like a Supreme Common Law Court of the United States. First, despite all of its federalism rhetoric, the Court seizes control of areas of the law that have traditionally been the domain of the states and imposes federal norms that is has created for the purpose. Second, the Court applies interpretive methods, in both constitutional and non-constitutional cases, that draw from traditional common law methodology and allow for a high degree of creativity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 71

Keywords: supreme court, judicial review, civil rights

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 12, 2008 ; Last revised: January 14, 2009

Suggested Citation

Beermann, Jack Michael, The Supreme Common Law Court of the United States (July 11, 2008). Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 09-03. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1158636 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1158636

Contact Information

Jack Michael Beermann (Contact Author)
Boston University School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-2577 (Phone)
617-353-3110 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 765
Downloads: 108
Download Rank: 143,125
Footnotes:  338

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.328 seconds