|
||||
|
||||
Delivery Options and Convexity in Treasury Bond and Note Futures
Robin Grieves University of Otago - School of Business Alan J. Marcus Boston College - Department of Finance Adrian Woodhams Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. - Goldman Sachs JBWere July 13, 2008 Abstract: Using Treasury bond and note futures to hedge fixed income portfolios is complicated by the large number of bonds that are eligible to deliver against the contract. Grieves and Marcus (2005) show that in some circumstances, only two bonds - those with the highest and the lowest durations - are relevant for the hedging problem, which makes computation of analytic hedge ratios tractable. We evaluate the empirical efficacy of their two-relevant-bond model. We compare the maturities of actual cheapest-to-deliver bonds to the prediction of the two-deliverable model, and calculate empirical price-values-of-a-basis-point for Treasury futures contracts to determine whether contract prices display the negative convexity predicted by the model. The model worked very well for the note contract and very poorly for the bond contract. We show that the difference in model performance is related to the shape of the yield curve.
Keywords: Delivery options, convexity, Treasury futures, hedging, PVBP JEL Classifications: G10, G13 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: July 14, 2008 ; Last revised: July 14, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo5b in 0.406 seconds.