Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1161155
 
 

Footnotes (13)



 


 



Institutional Considerations in Locating Norms of Consensus: A Cross-National Investigation


Rebecca Gill


University of Nevada, Las Vegas

April 4, 2008


Abstract:     
This paper is an investigation of the judicial norm of consensus in four national high courts: the High Court of Australia, the Supreme Court of Canada, the South African Supreme Court of Appeals (and Constitutional Court) and the House of Lords (Law Lords) in the United Kingdom. Research on consensual norms in the U.S. Supreme Court is outlined first. Then, after reviewing the methods of cointegration and suggesting an alternative to the Caldeira and Zorn (1998) procedure, this paper will explore the applicability of these methods to the location of consensual norms in different institutional contexts. Specifically, the importance of opinion-writing tradition and institutional legitimacy will be highlighted. Finally, aggregated opinion-writing data for each court will be analyzed. The results illustrate the importance of considering institutional variations when searching for evidence of consensual norms cross-nationally.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 17, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Gill, Rebecca, Institutional Considerations in Locating Norms of Consensus: A Cross-National Investigation (April 4, 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1161155 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1161155

Contact Information

Rebecca Gill (Contact Author)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas ( email )
4505 S. Maryland Parkway
Las Vegas, NV 89154
United States
HOME PAGE: http://faculty.unlv.edu/rwood
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 273
Downloads: 41
Footnotes:  13

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.266 seconds