SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Citations (4)

Beta

 
 

Footnotes (404)

Beta

 


 



The Transatlantic Divergence in Legal Thought: American Law and Economics vs. German Doctrinalism

Kristoffel R. Grechenig
Max-Planck-Institute for Research on Collective Goods; University of St. Gallen - Department of Law; Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration - Department of Business Law; University of St. Gallen - Department of Law

Martin Gelter
Fordham University School of Law; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration - Institute for Civil and Business Law



Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2008

Abstract:     
Economic analysis plays a major role in the American legal discourse, while its position in the German-speaking legal debate remains comparatively limited. In Germany and Austria, a widespread aversion against law and economics can be observed among legal scholars. This article advances an explanation for this divergence on the basis of two main factors: First, American legal realism enjoyed great success, whereas the German free-law movement failed to leave a lasting impression. While legal realism transformed American legal thought and opened up the discourse to policy arguments, the predominant German legal theory emphasizes the internal coherence of the legal system, and assigns only a limited role to external elements. Second, the different philosophical roots and attitude towards utilitarianism and consequentionalist thinking in general can explain why law and economics takes a prominent position in the US legal academia.

Keywords: Law and Economics, Legal Theory, Legal History, Legal Realism, Free-law movement, Legal Evolution, Utilitarianism, Europe, Germany, United States, Divergence

JEL Classifications: B15, B25, K00

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: July 16, 2008 ; Last revised: August 09, 2008

Suggested Citation

Grechenig, Kristoffel R. and Gelter, Martin, The Transatlantic Divergence in Legal Thought: American Law and Economics vs. German Doctrinalism (2008). Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1161168


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Martin Gelter (Contact Author)
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
646-312-8752 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.fordham.edu/faculty/10929.htm
European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)
Brussels B-1050
Belgium
HOME PAGE: http://www.ecgi.org/members_directory/member.php?member_id=621
Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration - Institute for Civil and Business Law ( email )
Althanstrasse 39-45
Vienna A-1090
Austria
Kristoffel R. Grechenig
Max-Planck-Institute for Research on Collective Goods ( email )
Kurt-Schumacher-Str. 10
D-53113 Bonn Germany
+49 228 91416-51 (Phone)
+49 228 91416-851 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.coll.mpg.de/grechenig.html

University of St. Gallen - Department of Law ( email )
Bodanstrasse 4
CH-9010 St. Gallen Switzerland
+41 71 224 3006 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.rwa.unisg.ch/org/rwa/web.nsf/wwwPubPersonGer/C1FDB36B816ACA00C12572CA002B448B

Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration - Department of Business Law
Vienna A-1090
Austria
University of St. Gallen - Department of Law
CH-9010 St. Gallen Switzerland
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 670
Downloads: 227
Download Rank: 39,577
Citations: 4
Footnotes: 404

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.187 seconds.