|
||||
|
||||
The Transatlantic Divergence in Legal Thought: American Law and Economics vs. German DoctrinalismKristoffel R. GrechenigMax-Planck-Institute for Research on Collective Goods Martin GelterFordham University School of Law; European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) 2008 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2008 Abstract: Economic analysis plays a major role in the American legal discourse, while its position in the German-speaking legal debate remains comparatively limited. In Germany and Austria, a widespread aversion against law and economics can be observed among legal scholars. This article advances an explanation for this divergence on the basis of two main factors: First, American legal realism enjoyed great success, whereas the German free-law movement failed to leave a lasting impression. While legal realism transformed American legal thought and opened up the discourse to policy arguments, the predominant German legal theory emphasizes the internal coherence of the legal system, and assigns only a limited role to external elements. Second, the different philosophical roots and attitude towards utilitarianism and consequentionalist thinking in general can explain why law and economics takes a prominent position in the US legal academia.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 66 Keywords: Law and Economics, Legal Theory, Legal History, Legal Realism, Free-law movement, Legal Evolution, Utilitarianism, Europe, Germany, United States, Divergence JEL Classification: B15, B25, K00 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 3, 2010 ; Last revised: March 4, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.422 seconds