Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1161319
 
 

Footnotes (167)



 


 



Probably? Understanding Tax Law's Uncertainty


Sarah B. Lawsky


University of California - Irvine School of Law


University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 157, 2009
GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 422
GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 422

Abstract:     
This Article analyzes the meaning of probability statements in tax law and in scholarship addressing civil tax penalties. Specifically, the Article draws on economics and the philosophy of mathematics to argue that because tax law is substantively uncertain, some probability statements in tax law are best understood as a reflection of the speaker's belief, rather than as a description of the number of times a given event will occur over the long run out of the number of times that it could occur. That is, these tax probability statements are best understood using a subjectivist interpretation of probability, rather than frequentist interpretation. Prior work in tax law scholarship in particular, and law and economics in general, has glossed over or misunderstood this crucial distinction.

Understanding that probability statements in tax law should be given a subjectivist interpretation changes both the theory and the practice of tax compliance. First, because tax probabilities represent beliefs, different parties - for example, Congress (the penalty-setter) on the one hand, and taxpayers on the other - may have different perceptions of the chances that a given transaction is permissible, and economic models should reflect these possibly disparate beliefs. Second, a subjectivist interpretation of tax probabilities provides additional support for stringent and much-criticized laws that regulate the substance of tax advisors' written opinions, as these strict rules may actually help tax advisors arrive at more accurate, less biased estimates of the chance that a tax position would be upheld by a court. And finally, a subjectivist interpretation suggests that lawmakers should be cautious of reducing tax law's uncertainty. If, as empirical work suggests, some taxpayers have an aversion to uncertainty, the uncertainty associated with whether certain questionable transactions are permitted (aside from any penalties imposed if transactions do turn out to be forbidden) may itself reduce the number of taxpayers who engage in these transactions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: tax, probability, penalties, welfarism, law and economics

JEL Classification: H20, K34

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 7, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Lawsky, Sarah B., Probably? Understanding Tax Law's Uncertainty. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 157, 2009; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 422; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 422. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1161319

Contact Information

Sarah B. Lawsky (Contact Author)
University of California - Irvine School of Law ( email )
401 E. Peltason Dr.
Irvine, CA 92697
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,119
Downloads: 454
Download Rank: 34,770
Footnotes:  167

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.281 seconds