Getting Less than Expected in Copyright Transfers
Thomas G. Field Jr.
University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center)
July 17, 2008
This comment explores Davis v. Blige, 505 F.3d 90 (2d Cir. 2007), and Sybersound Records, Inc. v. UAV Corp., 517 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2008), cases that address the rights of transferees from copyright cotenants, but from opposite perspectives. Blige does not permit defendant to evade liability by a retrospective transfer, but it casts no doubt on the capacity of transferees, exclusive or not, to sue on the same basis as original owners. Sybersound, however, refuses suit by a transferee without denying that right to the original owner andcontrasts starkly. That transferees do not stand in the shoes of their transferors for purposes of enforcement is a radical proposition that should be rejected.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 3
Keywords: co-owner, cotenant, copyright, F.R.C.Pro. 19, joinder, retrospective transfers
JEL Classification: K11, K29, K41
Date posted: July 17, 2008 ; Last revised: October 24, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.437 seconds