Originality: Does the Copyright Office Hide the Ball?
Thomas G. Field Jr.
University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center)
October 3, 2009
AIPLA Quarterly Journal, Vol. 37, p. 425, 2009
The Copyright Office, incapable in fact of determining the originality of most works, generally makes no attempt when registration is sought. Moreover, most works easily pass the test set out in the well-known Feist case.
Despite that, the Office singles out some types of work and commonly refuses registration for lack of originality. Courts, with one notable exception, have upheld its decisions.
Types of works in issue, however, often signal an agenda driven by subject matter, not originality. This paper argues that, until courts press harder, the Office will continue to hide the ball and fail better to articulate its criteria for selecting works found to warrant enhanced scrutiny.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23
Keywords: Administrative Procedure, judicial review, Copyright Office, copyright originality, copyright registration, refusals to register copyright
JEL Classification: K20, K23
Date posted: July 17, 2008 ; Last revised: October 31, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.797 seconds