Tafas v. Dudas: Elephants in Mouseholes
Thomas G. Field Jr.
University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center)
July 17, 2008
As many had hoped, Tafas v. Dudas, 2008 WL 859467 (E.D.Va.) finds rules promulgated by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) void under the Administrative Procedure Act. Tafas correctly rejects a PTO argument that 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2)(B) confers general authority to make binding substantive rules, quoting a Supreme Court observation that "Congress... does not... hide elephants in mouseholes." But Tafas goes too far. This comment explains why the court, having rejected that possibility, has found a larger animal in a smaller hole.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 2
Keywords: patent and trademark office, PTO, administrative process, rulemaking authority
JEL Classification: K20, K23working papers series
Date posted: July 18, 2008 ; Last revised: January 20, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.437 seconds