|
||||
|
||||
China's Future Lawyers: Some Differences in Education and OutlookPatricia Ross McCubbinSouthern Illinois University School of Law Malinda L. SeymoreTexas Wesleyan University School of Law Andrea Anne CurcioGeorgia State University - College of Law Llewellyn Joseph GibbonsUniversity of Toledo - College of Law; Fellow, Intellectual Property Rights Center Asper Review of International Business & Trade Law, Vol. 7, pp. 293-303, 2007 Abstract: In this short essay, four U.S. professors who recently served as Fulbright Lecturers in Law in China share important observations about China's future lawyers. The authors discuss key differences in the legal education systems of the two countries, noting that the most significant difference is the lack of Chinese training in the critical legal analysis so familiar to U.S.-trained lawyers. The authors also discuss Chinese law students' limited knowledge of the U.S. legal system and U.S. culture generally. This essay seeks to help members of the U.S. legal community understand the different skill sets and information that Chinese lawyers may bring to the table, in order to avoid "cultural encapsulation" - the tendency to have unfounded, ethnocentric expectations about their Chinese counterparts that could have profound, unintended effects on transnational interactions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 11 Keywords: China, Legal Education, Cultural Encapsulation, Critical Thinking JEL Classification: K00 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 21, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.625 seconds