A Question of Capacity: Towards a Comprehensive and Consistent Vision of Children and Their Status Under Law
St. John's University School of Law
July 1, 2006
Journal of Juvenile Law & Policy, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2006
What are children capable of doing? In the legal context, the answer depends on the subject. The law decrees that a 16-year-old is "incapable" of consenting to a simple contract, yet, in many jurisdictions, can be prosecuted as an adult on the theory that he or she has committed a very "adult" crime. At one time, 18-21-year-olds were not able to vote, but could consent to enter the armed forces. In some contexts, the law imposes a categorical rule: a child of a certain age is or is not automatically capable of consent. In other contexts, the law requires an examination of the particular child; consent is determined on a case-by-case basis. In this article, I propose a consistent way of viewing children under the law, in light of psychology's understanding about how children think and behave. I specifically propose the creation of a Model Children's Code so that issues of juvenile capacity can be addressed in a consistent, logical, and coherent fashion.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 104
Keywords: juvenile, capacity, child, children, underage, adult, code, consent, Piaget, consistency, competencyAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 19, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.500 seconds