|
||||
|
||||
The Persistence of the Small Firm/January Effect: Is it Consistent With Investors' Learning and Arbitrage Efforts?
Kathryn E. Easterday Miami University Farmer School of Business Pradyot K. Sen University of Cincinnati - Department of Accounting Jens Stephan University of Cincinnati - Department of Accounting Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Forthcoming Abstract: Using improved methodology and an expanded research design, we examine whether the small firm/January effect (Keim 1983) is declining over time due to market efficiency. First, we find that January returns are smaller after 1963-1979, but have simply reverted to levels that existed before that time. Second, we show that the January effect is not limited to mature markets but also appears in firms trading on the relatively new NASDAQ exchange in the 1970s. Third, trading volume for small firms in December and January is not different from other months, implying that traders are not actively arbitraging the anomaly. Together, our results suggest that this anomaly continues to defy rational explanation in an efficient market.
Keywords: January effect, market efficiency, arbitrage JEL Classifications: G12 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 22, 2008 ; Last revised: August 20, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apolloa 1 in 0.359 seconds.