Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1166402
 
 

Footnotes (144)



 


 



The Burden of Knowledge


Christian Turner


University of Georgia Law School

July 21, 2008

Georgia Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
Sometimes we are better off not knowing things. While we often hear that "ignorance is bliss," there has not been a comprehensive consideration in the legal academy of the virtues of ignorance and its regulation. Though the distribution of knowledge, like the distribution of other goods, is affected both directly and indirectly by law, several characteristics of knowledge distinguish it from other kinds of property. Much has been written about the impact of the nonrival and nonexclusive nature of knowledge on its production and distribution. This Article centers around two other attributes of knowledge that combine to create a special kind of problem: (1) its stickiness, meaning that once acquired knowledge may not be abandoned but only fortuitously forgotten, and (2) its capacity to impose substantial disutilities on its holder. If ignorance is a good, then knowledge must be avoided in the first instance.

My approach in this initial inquiry is pragmatic. I first consider four examples of knowledge that individuals may desire not to have, namely knowledge of one's genetic make-up and predispositions, knowledge of one's HIV status, lenders' knowledge of the race of a borrower, and lawyers' knowledge of the falsity of a client's proposed testimony or evidence. From these I abstract discrete categories of ignorance interests, centered around (a) whether or not knowledge is undesirable for its tendency to interfere with conduct and (b) whether or not knowledge is undesirable for its substance.

Finally, I begin to examine how we should respond legally to these interests in ignorance. I conclude that our decision whether to respect autonomy in making knowledge decisions is affected not only by our operating conception of autonomy but also the category of ignorance interest at issue. In addition, the nature of knowledge impacts our ability to ascertain preferences, our instrumental goals, and our choice of regulatory tools.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Keywords: information, knowledge, regulation, intellectual property, medical ethics

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 22, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Turner, Christian, The Burden of Knowledge (July 21, 2008). Georgia Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1166402

Contact Information

Christian Turner (Contact Author)
University of Georgia Law School ( email )
Athens, GA 30602
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,637
Downloads: 161
Download Rank: 106,228
Footnotes:  144

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds