|
||||
|
||||
Deputization of Indian Prosecutors: Protecting Indian Interests in Federal CourtLarry CunninghamSt. John's University School of Law 2000 Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 88, 2000 Abstract: Indian Law is full of jurisdictional traps for the unwary. This article proposes a solution to address one such trap that has caused harm to Indian tribes. When a non-Indian commits a crime in Indian country, he or she must be prosecuted in federal court. State courts lack jurisdiction over the case, absent statutory authority to the contrary. The Supreme Court held in Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe that tribal courts do not have the authority to punish non-Indians for crimes committed in Indian country. The reality is, however, that many U.S. attorneys do not have the resources or inclination to fully prosecute crimes in Indian country. This article proposes a practical solution to this problem: deputization of Indian lawyers as "Special Assistant United States Attorneys" to prosecute these crimes in federal court.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24 Keywords: Indian, Native American, prosecution, Oliphant, non-Indian, Indian country, crime Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 22, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds