SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (167)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Australia: Harmonisation of the Anti-Deferral Regimes

Lee Burns
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law



Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 269-288, 2007
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 08/65

Abstract:     
Australia has four anti-deferral regimes applicable to Australian residents that have interests in foreign entities. The regimes are (i) the controlled foreign companies (CFC) regime, (ii) the foreign investment fund (FIF) regime, (iii) the transferor trust regime, and (iv) the deemed present entitlement rules. The legislation enacting these regimes is among the most detailed and complex tax legislation in Australia. The regimes are not well coordinated, particularly the border between CFCs and FIFs, and the treatment of foreign trusts. They have different exemptions creating incentives for taxpayers to prefer one regime over another. The broad design of Australia's CFC rules largely follows that developed in pre-globalisation times, particularly by the United States and Canada. It is argued that the design does not adequately take account of the nature of the global economy today. The Australian Government has asked the Board of Taxation to, inter alia, examine ways in which the anti-deferral regimes can be better harmonised. This paper outlines the historical development of Australia's anti-deferral regimes and offers proposals for harmonisation.

Keywords: Active income exemption, Base company income, CFC, Comparable tax exemption, Deemed present entitlement rules, Deferral, FIF, Foreign trusts, Passive income, Transferor trusts

JEL Classifications: E62, H20, H25, K34, K10, K22

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: July 23, 2008 ; Last revised: July 23, 2008

Suggested Citation

Burns, Lee, Australia: Harmonisation of the Anti-Deferral Regimes (2007). Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 269-288, 2007; Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 08/65. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1170202


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Lee Burns (Contact Author)
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )
Faculty of Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia

Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 277
Downloads: 68
Download Rank: 101,479
Footnotes: 167
People who downloaded
this paper also downloaded:

1. Back to the Future? The Potential Revival of Territoriality
By Reuven Avi-Yonah

Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.109 seconds.