Abstract

 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (116)



 


 



Continental AG vs. Schaeffler, Hidden Ownership and European Law - Matter of Law or Enforcement?


Dirk A. Zetzsche


Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf - Faculty of Law - Center for Business & Corporate Law (CBC); University of Liechtenstein - Institute for Financial Services

October 29, 2008

European Business Organization Law Review, Vol. 10, 2009
CBC-RPS No. 0039

Abstract:     
This note presents my position regarding the hidden ownership schemes currently employed by the Schaeffler group to build up stakes in Continental AG in preparation for an unsolicited surprise cash-bid for Continental's shares. It summarizes the information publicly available on the Schaeffler / Continental case as of 19 August 2008, providing a useful source on hidden ownership schemes in general. Furthermore, it puts the Continental vs. Schaeffler pattern in context of Judge Kaplan's recent ruling in CSX / The Children's Investment Fund (TCI) as well as the FSA's forthcoming rule with respect to the disclosure of CFD long positions. Prompted by the Schaeffler group's current takeover bid for Continental, I hint at some of the results in two forthcoming articles of mine, titled 'Empty voting and Hidden Ownership - The European Perspective' and 'Challenging Wolf Packs - Thoughts on Efficient Enforcement of Shareholder Transparency Rules'.

I conclude that: 1) European law mandates disclosure of hidden ownership; 2) Hidden ownership issues are, in fact, those of enforcement in multi-party schemes (i.e. wolf packs or contractual acquisition networks organized by investment banks) where adverse incentives prevent all participants from disclosure; 3) Enforcement must shift from ex-post measures that insufficiently re-arrange the benefits of secrecy to an ex-ante self-regulatory approach that considers the incentive structure in multi-party schemes. A look at the leniency programs of antitrust law provides a starting point for a self-regulatory disclosure regime with respect to shareholder transparency rules.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Keywords: Hidden Ownership, Empty Voting, Morphable Ownership, Contracts for Differences, long position, disclosure, shareholder rights, enforcement, securities laws, self-regulation, ex-ante regulation, ex-post regulation, shareholder transparency rules, transparency, takeover, cash-bid, mandatory bid, early

JEL Classification: G10, G30, G34, G38, K20, K22

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 24, 2008 ; Last revised: April 2, 2010

Suggested Citation

Zetzsche, Dirk A., Continental AG vs. Schaeffler, Hidden Ownership and European Law - Matter of Law or Enforcement? (October 29, 2008). European Business Organization Law Review, Vol. 10, 2009; CBC-RPS No. 0039. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1170987 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1170987

Contact Information

Dirk Andreas Zetzsche (Contact Author)
Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf - Faculty of Law - Center for Business & Corporate Law (CBC) ( email )
Universitaetsstr. 1
D-40225 Düsseldorf
Germany
+49 211 81 15084 (Phone)
+49 211 81 11427 (Fax)
University of Liechtenstein - Institute for Financial Services ( email )
Fürst-Franz-Josef-Weg
Vaduz
Liechtenstein
+423 236 1195 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,616
Downloads: 1,273
Download Rank: 6,220
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  116

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.437 seconds