Behind this Mortal Bone: The (In)Effectiveness of Torture
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
July 23, 2008
Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 83, No. 1, 2008
Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 113
This Essay addresses the theoretical debate on torture in an empirical way. It urges that as part of our evaluation of the merits of torture, we take a shrewd look at the quality of information brutal interrogations produce. The Essay identifies widespread belief in what the author identifies as the "torture myth" the idea that torture is the most effective interrogation practice. In reality, in addition to its oft-acknowledged moral and legal problems, the use of torture carries with it a host of practical problems which seriously blunt its effectiveness. This Essay demonstrates that contrary to the myth, torture and the closely related practice, torture "lite" do not always produce the desired information and, in the cases in which it does, these practices may not produce it in a timely fashion. In the end, the Essay concludes, any marginal benefit the practice offers is low because traditional techniques of interrogation may be as good, and possibly even better at producing valuable intelligence.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24
Keywords: torture, human rights, false confession, police, investigation, international law, interrogation
JEL Classification: K10, K42Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 25, 2008
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.797 seconds