SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (48)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

On a Mathematical Argument for Splitting the Ninth Circuit

David H. Kaye
The Pennsylvania State University Dickinson School of Law



Jurimetrics, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 329-336, 2008

Abstract:     
For more than 30 years, there have been calls to split the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals into two smaller courts. This essay examines and finds unconvincing, a recent mathematical argument, based on sampling theory, for splitting the court.

Keywords: court size, sampling, judicial ideology, Ninth Circuit

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: July 24, 2008 ; Last revised: September 03, 2008

Suggested Citation

Kaye, David H., On a Mathematical Argument for Splitting the Ninth Circuit (July 23, 2008). Jurimetrics, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 329-336, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1171381


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

David H. Kaye (Contact Author)
The Pennsylvania State University Dickinson School of Law ( email )
Lewis Katz Building
University Park, PA 16802
United States
814 865-8974 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 117
Downloads: 20
Footnotes: 48

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.094 seconds.