Sex, Law and Consent
Robin L. West
Georgetown University Law Center
July 23, 2008
THE ETHICS OF CONSENT: THEORY AND PRACTICE, Alan Wertheimer, William Miller eds., Forthcoming
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 1172162
The article defends the now fairly conventional liberal reform position that consent ought to be the demarcation between rape and non-criminal sex, responding to both radical feminist and modern queer theoretic arguments that problematize it. It then criticizes liberal arguments that legitimize virtually all consensual sex, leaving all of it relatively insulated not only against criminalization but also against moral and political critique. Consensual sex can be wanted or unwanted, and when unwanted, it can be harmful in ways that cannot be recognized by liberal understandings of consensual sex. Lastly, the article defends this claim, again, against both radical feminist and queer theoretic critiques that for opposing reasons seek to undermine the distinction between unwanted and wanted consensual sex.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 45
Keywords: Sex, Consent, liberalismAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 24, 2008
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.375 seconds