|
||||
|
||||
Cultural Cognition and Public Policy: The Case of Outpatient Commitment LawsDan M. KahanYale University - Law School; Harvard University - Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics Donald BramanGeorge Washington University - Law School; Cultural Cognition Project John MonahanUniversity of Virginia School of Law Lisa Callahanaffiliation not provided to SSRN Ellen PetersOhio State University - Psychology Department; Decision Research; University of Oregon 2009 Law and Human Behavior, Forthcoming Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper No. 47 Harvard Law School Program on Risk Regulation Research Paper No. 08-21 Abstract: What explains controversy over outpatient commitment laws (OCLs), which authorize courts to order persons with mental illness to accept outpatient treatment? We hypothesized that attitudes toward OCLs reflect cultural cognition (DiMaggio 1997), which motivates individuals to conform their beliefs about policy-relevant facts to their cultural values. In a study involving a diverse sample of Americans (N = 1,496), we found that individuals who are hierarchical and communitarian tend to support OCLs, while those who are egalitarian and individualistic tend to oppose them. These relationships, moreover, fit the cultural cognition hypothesis: that is, rather than directly influencing OCL support, cultural values, mediated by affect, shaped individuals' perceptions of how effectively OCLs promote public health and safety. We discuss the implications for informed public deliberation over OCLs.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 51 Keywords: cultural cognition, outpatient commitment working papers seriesDate posted: July 29, 2008 ; Last revised: April 16, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.140 seconds