Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1185566
 
 

Footnotes (101)



 


 



Debating the Transformation of American Law: James Kent, Joseph Story, and the Legacy of the Revolution


Daniel J. Hulsebosch


New York University School of Law

July 29, 2008

The Transformation in American Legal History: Essays in the Honor of Morton J. Horwitz, 2008
NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 08-44

Abstract:     
Using a variety of sources, including recently discovered letters and notes in James Kent's law library, this essay will demonstrate that although Kent and Joseph Story agreed about the desirability of a strong Congress, an independent federal judiciary, and the need to control juries, they disagreed about the shape of each of these institutions. Together, these disagreements reveal not only the dynamism of American law in the early Republic - a conclusion consistent with Morton J. Horwitz's interpretation in his Transformation of American Law I - but also illuminate the indeterminacy of federal authority and the judicial power - findings that fit more comfortably with the premises and methods of Horwitz's Transformation of American Law II. In addition, their disagreements illustrate the quest for authoritative reasoning that defined post-revolutionary American legal culture and the intertextuality of its formative literature.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: July 29, 2008 ; Last revised: November 18, 2008

Suggested Citation

Hulsebosch, Daniel J., Debating the Transformation of American Law: James Kent, Joseph Story, and the Legacy of the Revolution (July 29, 2008). The Transformation in American Legal History: Essays in the Honor of Morton J. Horwitz, 2008; NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 08-44. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1185566

Contact Information

Daniel J. Hulsebosch (Contact Author)
New York University School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
503
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 765
Downloads: 161
Download Rank: 107,908
Footnotes:  101

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.796 seconds