Do Mandatory Hedge Disclosures Discourage or Encourage Excessive Speculation?
38 Pages Posted: 30 Jul 2008
Date Written: August 16, 2007
Abstract
In order to shed some light on the desirability of hedge disclosures, I investigate the consequences of hedge disclosures on a firm's risk management strategy. Several major results emerge from this analysis. First, greater transparency about a firm's derivative activities is not necessarily a panacea for imprudent risk management strategies. I show that such transparency actually induces the firm to take excessive speculative positions in the derivative market. Second, I show that the firm may choose a prudent risk management strategy in the absence of hedge disclosures. However, the selection of a prudent risk management comes at a cost. The firm's production policy is distorted in the absence of hedge disclosures.
These findings suggest that the FASB must carefully investigate the trade-offs between production distortions and risk management distortions in evaluating the desirability of mandatory hedge disclosures for all firms.
JEL Classification: M40, M41, M44, M45, M46, L23
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Hedge Disclosures, Futures Prices, and Production Distortions
By Chandra Kanodia, Arijit Mukherji, ...
-
Comparing Alternative Hedge Accounting Standards: Shareholders? Perspective
By Nahum D. Melumad, Guy Weyns, ...
-
Strategic Consequences of Historical Cost and Fair Value Measurements
-
Public Disclosure of Forward Contracts and Revelation of Proprietary Information
By John S. Hughes, Jennifer L. Kao, ...
-
Accounting for Derivatives and Corporate Risk Management Policies
-
Bertrand Competition, Market Information and Observability
By Carolyn M. Callahan and Emily Keenan
-
Hedge Accounting Versus No Hedge Accounting for Cash Flow Hedges