|
||||
|
||||
Review of R.A. Duff, Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal LawAdil Ahmad HaqueRutgers, The State University of New Jersey - School of Law-Newark July 29, 2008 Law & Politics Book Review, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 423-426, May 2008 Rutgers School of Law-Newark Research Papers No. 028 Abstract: Every account of the structure of criminal law involves an attempt to explain the content of and relationship between four basic concepts: wrongdoing, responsibility, fault, and punishment. The most ambitious accounts focus on a single concept in terms of which the others can be understood. ANSWERING FOR CRIME contains illuminating discussions of a variety of discrete issues, ranging from the relationship between attacks and endangerments to the difference between strict responsibility and strict liability, to the justification of mala prohibita crimes. But the greatest contribution of this marvelous book lies in Antony Duff's elegant and arresting vision of criminal law's conceptual foundation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 5 Keywords: Criminal law, R.A. Duff, responsibility, justification, excuse Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 30, 2008 ; Last revised: December 21, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.422 seconds