Footnotes (16)



Admission to Practice Before the U.S.P.T.O. in Patent Cases

Thomas G. Field Jr.

University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center)

July 31, 2008

The Agency Practice Act, 5 U.S.C. § 500(b), provides that any lawyer in good standing in a state bar may practice before any federal agency. Sec. 500(e), however, provides that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) may impose additional requirements upon those who prosecute patent applications.

The accompanying file contains: (1) my February 2006 petition to the PTO that requests notice and comment rulemaking to address specific technical qualifications attorneys need to sit for the so-called patent bar, (2) a December 2005 declaration by Professor Stanley C. Eisenstat, Dept. of Computer Science, Yale University, pointing out that criteria for admission of lawyers holding computer science degrees were irrational, and (3) a May 2006 response from James A. Toupin, General Counsel, PTO denying the petition. Building on these documents, prior related work and substantial later work, Ralph C. Clifford, Jon Cavicchi and I published “A Statistical Analysis of the Patent Bar, Where are the Software-Savvy Patent Attorneys?” 11 N. Car. J. Law & Tech. 223 (2010).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: agency practice act, patent attorney, patent bar, rulemaking petition, law and technology, law and science, software patents

JEL Classification: K23

working papers series

Download This Paper

Date posted: July 31, 2008 ; Last revised: May 14, 2014

Suggested Citation

Field, Thomas G., Admission to Practice Before the U.S.P.T.O. in Patent Cases (July 31, 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1192402 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1192402

Contact Information

Thomas G. Field Jr. (Contact Author)
University of New Hampshire School of Law ( email )
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,469
Downloads: 199
Download Rank: 92,729
Footnotes:  16
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.343 seconds