Abstract

 
 

References (31)



 


 



Risk, Employee Incentive Intensity and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence


Joanna L.Y. Ho


University of California, Irvine - Accounting Area

Ling-Chu Lee


National Pingtung Institute of Commerce

Anne Wu


National Chengchi University (Taipei)

August 2, 2008


Abstract:     
The agent theory is of central importance to compensation contract, which argues that incentive intensity should be negatively associated with risk. Yet, previous studies have reported mixed findings on this relationship. This study empirically examines this relationship by utilizing data obtained from a major car dealership in Taiwan in which levels of delegation and monitoring costs are held constant. Our overall results support the prediction of agency theory, namely, that auto dealership branches reduce incentive intensity for salespersons when facing higher risks. Importantly, we find that branches giving salespersons lower incentive intensity in more risky environments perform better than those that do not employ compensation practices based on the agency theory.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: Risk, Compensation, Incentive Intensity, Performance

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 5, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Ho, Joanna L.Y., Lee, Ling-Chu and Wu, Anne, Risk, Employee Incentive Intensity and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence (August 2, 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1196903 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1196903

Contact Information

Joanna L.Y. Ho
University of California, Irvine - Accounting Area ( email )
Irvine, CA 92697-3125
United States
949-824-4041 (Phone)
949-725-2833 (Fax)
Ling-Chu Lee (Contact Author)
National Pingtung Institute of Commerce ( email )
51 Min-Sheng E. Road
Pingtung, Taiwan 900
Republic of China
Anne Wu
National Chengchi University (Taipei) ( email )
No. 64, Chih-Nan Road
Section 2
Wenshan, Taipei 11623
Taiwan
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 635
Downloads: 114
Download Rank: 123,034
References:  31

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.578 seconds