Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1211166
 
 

Footnotes (106)



 


 



But He Doesn't Look Retarded: Challenges to Jury Selection in the Capital Case for the Mentally Retarded Client Not Excluded Under Atkins v. Virginia


Andrea D. Lyon


DePaul University - College of Law

August 7, 2008


Abstract:     
While it is true that in Atkins v. Virginia the United States Supreme Court held that it was unconstitutional to execute the mentally retarded, the Court left it up to the states, both substantively and procedurally, to define and remove the mentally retarded from the pool of death-eligible capital defendants. History teaches us that these procedures and policies will not always remove the mentally retarded from that pool, and that the capital defender is often left defending a death penalty case for a mentally retarded defendant. This article explores the challenges presented in jury selection when that is the case.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: death penalty, jury selection, mental retardation, mitigation

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 8, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Lyon, Andrea D., But He Doesn't Look Retarded: Challenges to Jury Selection in the Capital Case for the Mentally Retarded Client Not Excluded Under Atkins v. Virginia (August 7, 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1211166 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1211166

Contact Information

Andrea D. Lyon (Contact Author)
DePaul University - College of Law ( email )
25 E. Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL Cook County 60604-2287
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 464
Downloads: 49
Footnotes:  106

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.234 seconds