A Performance Evaluation Program for the Federal Judiciary
Rebecca Love Kourlis
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Jordan M. Singer
New England Law | Boston
August 8, 2008
Denver University Law Review, Vol. 86, No. 1, 2008
Judicial performance evaluation (JPE) programs have existed at the state level for over thirty years as a means of promoting judicial accountability for a fair, courteous and efficient court process. These programs have been shown to provide judges with valuable information for their own professional development, and the public with valuable information about its judges. Despite their proven benefits, however, JPE programs have never been considered seriously at the federal level. This Article describes the qualities of the most successful state JPE programs, considers the historical obstacles to federal JPE, and ultimately proposes a framework for a JPE program for United States District and Magistrate Judges that will seek to preserve judicial independence, provide information for judges to improve their performance, and increase the public's confidence in the courts.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 45
Keywords: Judicial performance evaluation, JPE, federal courts, accountability, independence, judicial trainingAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 10, 2008 ; Last revised: November 7, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.641 seconds