Adorno vs. Levinas: Evaluating Points of Contention
University of New Hampshire
August 8, 2008
Continental Philosophy Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 275-306, 2007
Although Adorno and Levinas share many arguments, I attempt to sharpen and evaluate their disagreements. Both held extreme and seemingly opposite views of art, with Adorno arguing that art presents modernity's highest order of truth and Levinas denouncing it as shameful idolatry. Considering this striking difference brings to light fundamental substantive and methodological incompatibilities between them. Levinas' assertion of the transcendence of the face should be understood as the most telling point of departure between his and Adorno's critiques of instrumental reason. I attempt to explain why Levinas believed this move was justifiable and how Adorno would understand Levinas' notion of illeity as a cultural byproduct and a form of dogmatism. Adorno's historical and sociological account of the disenchantment of the world and the destruction of aura within a culture fully administered by scientific rationality and economic reductionism sharply contrasts to Levinas' transcendental phenomenology, and I argue that Adorno's thoroughgoing refusal to constrain dialectical reflection is ultimately more compelling.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 10, 2008
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.438 seconds