Comparative Forum Non Conveniens and the Hague Judgments Convention
Ronald A. Brand
University of Pittsburgh - School of Law
August 9, 2008
Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 37, pp. 467-498, 2002
U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper Series
This article begins with a discussion of the application of the forum non conveniens doctrine in four common law legal systems. It then briefly notes related concepts applied in the courts of two civil law systems. This discussion is followed in Part IV by a brief history of the negotiations at the Hague Conference on Private International Law for a Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters and a review of Articles 21 and 22 of the Interim Text of that Convention created at the June 2001 portion of the Diplomatic Conference. This review allows conclusions dealing with both the role of the forum non conveniens doctrine in contemporary transnational litigation and the effort to bring traditional common law and civil law approaches to parallel litigation closer together.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32
Keywords: orum non conveniens, common law legal systems, civil law legal systems, Hague Conference on Private International Law, Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters, transnational litigation, recognition, enforcement, parallel litigation, judicial cooperation, privAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 10, 2008
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.484 seconds