Statutes' Domains in Private International Law: An Economic Theory of the Limits of Mandatory Rules

32 Pages Posted: 13 Sep 1998

See all articles by Michael J. Whincop

Michael J. Whincop

Griffith University - Griffith Law School

Mary Keyes

Griffith University - Griffith Law School

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: August 1998

Abstract

Law and economics scholars have argued strenuously in favour of the use of default rules applying to contracts, rather than uncontractible mandatory rules. The mandatory/default dichotomy is, however, a domestic concept, which needs to be opened out for use in a multistate context. We argue that the concept of the default rule breaks down into three categories: fully contractible rule defaults, choice of law defaults (which permit the parties to select contractually the law applying to their contract), forum defaults (which permit the parties to select the forum for litigation, in which their contractual rights can be enforced). An international mandatory rule purports to abrogate all three default concepts, by committing local courts to exercise jurisdiction and apply the rule. We show why choice of law and forum defaults have value, and that legislatures may rationally choose to retain them even if they destroy rule defaults.

With this apparatus, we examine a recent trend in the interpretation of statutes creating apparently mandatory rules, as manifested in English and Australian appellate courts. These courts have used purposive interpretation arguments to annihilate choice of law and forum defaults, notwithstanding an absence of textual support. We demonstrate the flaws in this line of argument, and, consistent with resurgent interest in statutory interpretation amongst economically-minded scholars, posit 'canons' for the interpretation of contracts statutes.

JEL Classification: K12, K33

Suggested Citation

Whincop, Michael J. and Keyes, Mary, Statutes' Domains in Private International Law: An Economic Theory of the Limits of Mandatory Rules (August 1998). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=121599 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.121599

Michael J. Whincop (Contact Author)

Griffith University - Griffith Law School ( email )

Nathan Campus, GU
Nathan 4111
Australia
+617 3875 6559 (Phone)
+617 3875 5599 (Fax)

Mary Keyes

Griffith University - Griffith Law School ( email )

Nathan Campus, GU
Nathan 4111
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
476
Abstract Views
3,260
Rank
110,338
PlumX Metrics