Regulatory Competition in Partnership Law
Mathias M. Siems
Durham University - Durham Law School; University of Cambridge - Centre for Business Research
December 20, 2008
Regulatory competition in company law has been extensively debated in the last few decades, but it has rarely been discussed whether there could also be regulatory competition in partnership law. This article fills this gap. It addresses the partnership law of the US, the UK, Germany, and France, and presents empirical data on the different types of partnerships and companies established in these jurisdictions. The first main part finds that in the US there is both vertical and horizontal competition in partnership law. In most states businesses and professionals can freely choose between a number of entity forms, such as LLPs, LLCs and different types of corporations. Moreover, states themselves care about the attractiveness of their partnership law. This is most noticeable for Delaware's law on limited partnerships but one can also identify some regulatory competition for the "best" LLP law. The second main part turns to the situation in the European Union. Here the legal landscape is more diverse because only the UK law knows the LLP, whereas in Germany and France there are other forms of partnership and company law which, for instance, may be used by law firms (e.g. PartG, Anwalts-GmbH, SCP, SEP, SELARL). However, these legal forms can only provide a partial substitute for the UK LLP. Since the freedom of establishment of the EC Treaty allows continental firms to choose the UK LLP, it is therefore likely that regulatory competition will also develop in partnership law in the EU.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36
Keywords: partnership law, regulatory competition, limited liability, Limited Liability Partnership, LLP, LLLP, LLC, limited partnership, PartG, SELARL, comparative partnership law, Centros, freedom of establishment, law firms, Jersey, Cartesio
JEL Classification: G30, K00, K22, K29, N40, P50working papers series
Date posted: August 14, 2008 ; Last revised: October 23, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.324 seconds