Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1233162
 


 



Text, Style, Presentation - Assessing the Drafting Experiment in Australian Tax Laws


Graeme S. Cooper


University of Sydney - Faculty of Law

August 18, 2008

Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 08/92

Abstract:     
Australian tax drafting is now a small distinctive enclave within the larger realm of legislative drafting because the tax system has been chosen as the site for a novel drafting project. This has been done in the apparent belief that changing the choice and organisation of words within the tax Acts can deliver significant benefits to the community. The assumption underlying this belief is that much of the blame for the multitude of complaints made against the Australian tax system should be attributed to an incomprehensible statute, rather than, say confused policy choices or mistaken assumptions. This paper analyses the language, the style and the presentation of Australia's tax statutes - that is, the words chosen by the drafters to express legislative intent and the way those words are organised and presented to readers.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 46

Keywords: legislative drafting, income tax, tax reform

JEL Classification: K34, K40, H20, G38, H83

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 20, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Cooper, Graeme S., Text, Style, Presentation - Assessing the Drafting Experiment in Australian Tax Laws (August 18, 2008). Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 08/92. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1233162 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1233162

Contact Information

Graeme S. Cooper (Contact Author)
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law ( email )
Faculty of Law Building, F10
The University of Sydney
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,027
Downloads: 126
Download Rank: 134,604

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.922 seconds