Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1235537
 
 

Citations (4)



 
 

Footnotes (40)



 


 



Heller and Second Amendment Precedent


Nelson Lund


George Mason University School of Law

August 18, 2008

Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 335-347, 2009
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 08-48

Abstract:     
District of Columbia v. Heller concluded, on the basis of a detailed analysis of the original meaning of the Second Amendment, that American citizens have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms for personal self defense, and held that this entails at least the right to keep a handgun in the home and to render it operable for the purpose of immediate self defense. The Court rejected a theory - unknown to the founding generation but accepted by most of the lower federal courts during the twentieth century - under which the Second Amendment protects only a right of state governments to maintain military organizations, or perhaps a right of individuals to have weapons only while serving in such organizations.

In this case, the Justices were confronted with only one significant Supreme Court precedent, an eight page opinion in United States v. Miller. Surprisingly, Heller contains an embarrassingly and pointlessly fictional statement of the procedural facts of the Miller case. More importantly, the Court does quote from Miller, and the Court does interpret the Miller opinion, but in doing so it distorts the holding beyond all recognition.

This brief essay analyzes Heller's treatment of Miller. The interpretations of the Second Amendment in the two cases are irreconcilable. There was no legal need for the Heller Court to treat Miller as a binding precedent, and no legal excuse for pretending that Miller's holding was consistent with the interpretation of the Constitution that Heller rightly adopted. The treatment of Miller appears to be part of a larger political strategy in which the Court displayed a calculated faint-heartedness toward the original meaning of the Second Amendment. We can only hope that future Courts will treat Heller in a more lawyerly manner than Heller treated Miller.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: Constitution, D.C. v. Heller, handgun, militia, Second Amendment, U.S. v. Miller

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 20, 2008 ; Last revised: March 27, 2014

Suggested Citation

Lund, Nelson, Heller and Second Amendment Precedent (August 18, 2008). Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 335-347, 2009; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 08-48. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1235537

Contact Information

Nelson Robert Lund (Contact Author)
George Mason University School of Law ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
703-993-8045 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,078
Downloads: 285
Download Rank: 60,936
Citations:  4
Footnotes:  40

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.234 seconds