Damaged Awards: The Vicissitudes of Life as a Woman
University of Sydney - Faculty of Law
August, 21 2008
Torts Law Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 160-168, 1995
Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 08/96
This article engages with the ways in which the assessment of damages for personal injuries reflects deeply gendered assumptions about women's and men's roles. It arose out of a decision of the NSW Court of Appeal (which later went to the High Court of Australia) in NSW Insurance Ministerial Corporation v Wynn. The Court of Appeal had substantially reduced a trial judge's damages award for a woman executive whose injury had impaired her earning capacity, by taking into account gendered assumptions about her lack of attachment to the paid labour market. In particular, the court had discounted the award heavily for 'vicissitudes' of life which included that she may not want to continue working once she had children; that promotion for her would involve too great a sacrifice for her husband. The author suggested that the High Court needed to address the marginalisation of women's paid work that emerged from a reading of case law in this area.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10
Keywords: tort law, personal injury, gender bias, judicial decision making, damages, women's work, loss of earning capacity
JEL Classification: J16, J30, J70, K10, K30Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: August 21, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.829 seconds