Abstract

 


 



Fiduciary Mechanics


Robert Flannigan


University of Saskatchewan

August 22, 2008

Canadian Labour and Employment Law Journal, Vol. 14, p. 25, 2008

Abstract:     
There is a stubborn confusion as to the scope of fiduciary accountability. That confusion may be relieved in part by examining the fiduciary aspects of the mechanic undertaking. Some might think it fanciful to regard mechanics as subject to fiduciary accountability. That, however, is only the sequelae of the existing confusion. Mechanics are engaged in limited access arrangements, and all such arrangements are regulated by fiduciary accountability. It does not matter that an arrangement may be of modest character, or may not involve subjective trust. Other employment and independent contractor arrangements further illustrate the nature of the opportunism mischief that fiduciary regulation is designed to control. Professors, lawyers, police officers and interior designers have fiduciary obligations to the extent of their limited access. That fuller appreciation of the nature of the fiduciary jurisdiction leads to rejection or reconstruction of a number of propositions that enjoy currency in the courts today.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 23, 2008 ; Last revised: March 5, 2009

Suggested Citation

Flannigan, Robert, Fiduciary Mechanics (August 22, 2008). Canadian Labour and Employment Law Journal, Vol. 14, p. 25, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1247852

Contact Information

Robert Flannigan (Contact Author)
University of Saskatchewan ( email )
15 Campus Drive
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A6
Canada
306-966-5876 (Phone)
306-966-5900 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,238
Downloads: 451
Download Rank: 29,136

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.563 seconds