Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1247854
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (194)



 


 



Taking Property Rights Seriously? The Supreme Court and the 'Poor Relation' of Constitutional Law


Ilya Somin


George Mason University School of Law

August 22, 2008

George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 08-53

Abstract:     
Over the last twenty-five years, the Supreme Court has expanded protection for constitutional property rights. After decades of neglect, the Court has begun to take property rights seriously. At the same time, however, protection for property rights still falls far short of that enjoyed by most other individual rights. In case after case, the Court has expressed support for property rights, but stopped short of providing them with more than minimal protection. Despite the Court's own rhetoric to the contrary, property rights are still the "poor relation" of the Constitution.

Part I of this article analyzes the Court's recent property rights jurisprudence. It particularly focuses on the Court's decisions interpreting the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. I examine key decisions on public use, regulatory takings, remedies for takings clause violations, and access to federal courts for citizens who claim that their property rights have been violated. In most of these fields, recent court decisions have modestly expanded protection for property owners. However, the Court's decisions in each area fall far short of giving property rights the same degree of protection as that extended to most other individual rights.

Part II considers some of the standard rationales for denying judicial protection for property rights equal to that enjoyed by other constitutional rights. It addresses claims that property rights deserve little or no protection because they are already protected by the political process, because the courts lack expertise on economic issues, because judicial protection would benefit the rich at the expense of the poor, because the Courts should not enforce supposedly arbitrary common law property baselines, and because judicial protection for property rights might harm the environment. I suggest that each of these concerns is overstated, and that many apply with equal or greater force to the enforcement of other constitutional rights. Moreover, expanded judicial protection for property rights might actually benefit the poor more than the wealthy and may in some important cases promote environmental protection rather than diminish it.

Finally, Part III briefly considers the future of constitutional property rights. In the long run, judicial protection for property rights can only be effective if it is embraced by jurists from a broad portion of the political spectrum. Property rights probably will not get much more judicial solicitude than they enjoy today if support for them remains confined to judicial conservatives and libertarians. Outside the Court, some liberal jurists and activists have shown an increasing willingness to reconsider traditional post-New Deal hostility to property rights. The strong left of center reaction against the Court's decision in Kelo v. City of New London may point the way forward to cross-ideological cooperation on these issues.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: condemnation, Constitutional Law, economic development, eminent domain, Fifth Amendment, individual rights, judicial power, Kelo v. New London, post-Kelo reform, property, Supreme Court, takings

JEL Classification: D23, K11

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 23, 2008 ; Last revised: June 25, 2012

Suggested Citation

Somin, Ilya, Taking Property Rights Seriously? The Supreme Court and the 'Poor Relation' of Constitutional Law (August 22, 2008). George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 08-53. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1247854

Contact Information

Ilya Somin (Contact Author)
George Mason University School of Law ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
703-993-8069 (Phone)
703-993-8124 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://mason.gmu.edu/~isomin/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,773
Downloads: 661
Download Rank: 20,697
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  194

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.203 seconds