Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1253172
 
 

Footnotes (52)



 


 



Food Fight! Davis versus Regan on the Ethics of Eating Beef


Andy Lamey


University of California, San Diego

August 25, 2008

Journal of Social Philosophy, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 331-348, Summer 2007

Abstract:     
One of the starting assumptions in the debate over the ethical status of animals is that someone who is committed to reducing animal suffering should not eat meat. Steven Davis has recently advanced a novel criticism of this view. He argues that individuals who are committed to reducing animal suffering should not adopt a vegetarian or vegan diet, as Tom Regan an other animal rights advocates claim, but one containing free-range beef. To make his case Davis highlights an overlooked form of animal harm, that done to field animals in crop production. Yet while Davis's argument is ingenious and thought-provoking, it is not a successful challenge to vegetarianism and veganism's status as the diets that most advance animal rights. Scientific studies of crop production that Davis draws on document two different forms of harm done to field animals: those that are directly killed by harvesting equipment and those that are killed by other animals. Once this distinction is made explicit, the degree to which such studies pose a problem for animal protection theory considerably weakens. Davis also overlooks philosophically significant forms of harm to human beings that are present in beef production but not crop harvesting. Finally, he bases his argument on the controversial assumption that there is no difference between deliberate and accidental killing - either of animals or people. Although these problems defeat Davis's attempt to offer an immanent critique of Regan's animal rights position, his analysis does have important dietary ramifications that animal advocates should take into account.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: philosophy, ethics, animal rights, animal welfare, vegetarianism, veganism, Tom Regan, agriculture

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: August 27, 2008 ; Last revised: December 18, 2008

Suggested Citation

Lamey, Andy, Food Fight! Davis versus Regan on the Ethics of Eating Beef (August 25, 2008). Journal of Social Philosophy, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 331-348, Summer 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1253172

Contact Information

Andy Lamey (Contact Author)
University of California, San Diego ( email )
Department of Philosophy
9500 Gilman Drive 0119
La Jolla, CA 92093-0119
United States
(858) 534-9111 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://andylamey.com
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,946
Downloads: 706
Download Rank: 18,943
Footnotes:  52

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.375 seconds