Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1259314
 
 

Footnotes (429)



 


 



Pierce Butler: A Supreme Technician


David R. Stras


Minnesota Supreme Court

August 26, 2008

Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 62, 2009
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-35

Abstract:     
Despite serving more than sixteen years on the Supreme Court of the United States and authoring more than 300 opinions, Pierce Butler is one of the most overlooked Justices in American history. Relying on primary source documents housed at the Library of Congress, the University of Washington, the Carleton College archives, and the University of Minnesota archives, this Article is one of the first extensive treatments of Justice Butler in legal scholarship.

As part of a broader symposium on neglected Supreme Court Justices hosted by the Vanderbilt Law Review, this Article highlights four reasons why Butler has been ignored by scholars. First, Butler wrote in highly-technical areas of the law, such as public utilities regulation and tax law, which are of relatively low public salience and are consistently ignored by constitutional scholars who closely study the Supreme Court. Second, Butler's approach to opinion-writing stressed simplicity and minimalism, and it was rare indeed when he used rhetorical flourishes to argue a point. Third, Butler served with a highly-distinguished group of jurists and American historical figures, such as William Howard Taft, Benjamin Cardozo, Oliver Wendell Holmes, and Louis Brandeis, some of whom are consistently rated as the most successful Supreme Court Justices of all time. Finally, in those areas in which he wrote extensively, such as economic liberties, public utilities regulation, and taxation, he found himself on the wrong side of history. As a strict adherent to Lochner, for example, his opinions favoring property rights and economic liberties were essentially overruled by the end of his tenure on the Court.

This Article further challenges some of the fundamental assumptions about Justice Butler by offering a constitutional reassessment that challenges some of the traditional views about Butler's jurisprudence. In contrast to prior characterizations, Butler was hardly a monolithic conservative, as evidenced by his pro-defendant criminal rights and nuanced Fourteenth Amendment jurisprudence. Although this Article does not claim that Butler was one of the great Justices, it does point out that he is deeply understudied, likely underestimated, and regrettably misunderstood.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 62

Keywords: Pierce Butler, Supreme Court, Four Horsemen

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: August 26, 2008 ; Last revised: April 7, 2009

Suggested Citation

Stras, David R., Pierce Butler: A Supreme Technician (August 26, 2008). Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 62, 2009; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-35. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1259314

Contact Information

David R. Stras (Contact Author)
Minnesota Supreme Court ( email )
25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd
St. Paul, MN 55155
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,668
Downloads: 164
Download Rank: 107,778
Footnotes:  429

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.359 seconds