The Fine Line between Interrogation and Retribution
Kevin M. Carlsmith
Colgate University - Psychology Department
Avani Mehta Sood
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law
October 1, 2008
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Forthcoming
The use of harsh interrogation techniques on terrorism suspects is typically justified on utilitarian grounds. The present research suggests, however, that those who support such techniques are fuelled by retributive motives. An experimental study conducted with a broad national sample of U.S. residents found that the desire for harsh interrogation is largely isomorphic with the desire to punish, and that both effects are mediated by the perceived moral status of the target, but not the perceived effectiveness of the interrogation. Results are discussed with regard to retributive justice and the national policy on interrogation and torture.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6
Keywords: Retribution, Utility, Interrogation, Torture, Punishment motives, Retributive justice
Date posted: August 28, 2008 ; Last revised: October 1, 2008
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.266 seconds