Objectivity and Subjectivity in Contract Law: A Copernican Response to Professor Shiffrin
Jeffrey M. Lipshaw
Suffolk University Law School
August 28, 2008
Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2008
Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 08-28
This is a response to Seana Shiffrin's recent and important contribution to the continuing debate whether there is a universal moral or economic truth at the heart of contract law. Her most significant advance toward a general theory of promise and contract is not, however, her analysis of the divergence of morality and contract, but instead her identification of the critical moment at which the interposition of the public in a private matter occurs or is contemplated. This essay carries that theme forward, suggesting that a universal justification for contract law is not possible because the law, by its very nature, objectifies (publicly or with that implicit threat) what was heretofore a private relationship.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 15
Keywords: contract, promise, Shiffrin, justification, public, private
JEL Classification: K10, K12
Date posted: August 31, 2008 ; Last revised: September 26, 2008
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 1.094 seconds