Yes to Nondiscrimination, No to New Forms of Criminal Liability: A Response to Collins, Leib, and Markel
Michael M. O'Hear
Marquette University - Law School
August 29, 2008
Boston University Law Review, Vol. 89, 2008
Marquette Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 08-19
This Essay responds to a new article by Jennifer Collins, Ethan Leib, and Dan Markel, Punishing Family Status, 89 B.U. L. Rev. _ (2008). Among other things, Collins et al. offer a new normative framework for determining when and how the criminal law may appropriately be used to promote voluntary care-giving relationships. This Essay argues that their framework is misconceived in two respects. First, voluntariness does not offer a persuasive foundation for criminal enforcement of care-giving responsibilities. The voluntary assumption of responsibilities later neglected has not generally been regarded as either necessary or sufficient as a basis for criminal liability, and the type of voluntariness upon which Collins and her coauthors rely actually provides little support for the possible expansion of criminal liability contemplated by their framework. Second, criminal law is generally a poor device for promoting changes in private behavior and raising the status of traditionally marginalized groups (a central aim of Collins and her coauthors). Indeed, in light of the vast gap between the scope of the criminal law and the resources available to police and prosecutors, changes in formal law may prove counterproductive with respect to the normative ends that Collins et al. seek to achieve.
A draft of Punishing Family Status can be found at:
A draft of the reply to this response essay can be found at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1261563
Number of Pages in PDF File: 15
Keywords: criminal law
JEL Classification: K14, K42Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: September 3, 2008
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.640 seconds