Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1261294
 
 

Footnotes (250)



 


 



Why Donated Monuments are Government Speech: The Hard Case of Pleasant Grove City v. Summum


Mary Jean Dolan


affiliation not provided to SSRN


Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 58, No. 1, Fall 2008

Abstract:     
This Article expands upon an amicus brief I wrote for the International Municipal Lawyers’ Association (IMLA) on behalf of Petitioner in Pleasant Grove City v. Summum. In Summum, the Court held that donated monuments displayed in public parks are “government speech,” not private speech, and so the First Amendment did not apply to the City’s monument selection decisions. The IMLA brief, which was cited and relied on by the Court, provided an extensive look at municipal monument practices around the country. This Article provides a more complete description of the IMLA survey’s methodology, and a deeper analysis of how local governments interact with the private sector to create and respond to monuments’ perceived messages.

This Article also builds on an earlier 2004 article, in which I argued that new public-private expressive partnerships sometimes require an expanded doctrine of government speech. In line with the analysis used by the Court in Summum, I asserted that in some contexts, the doctrine should encompass not only specific statutory policies, but also broad, thematic government “identity” messages. As shown in both articles, limited public forum analysis frequently is insufficient to support valuable projects, especially as viewpoint and content became indistinguishable. Earlier, I proposed limiting principles based on written program criteria; here, I explain why this theory also should apply in the donated monument context, which typically is more ad hoc than programmatic. This Article originally was posted on SSRN in August 2008, in part to supplement the amicus brief by acknowledging the important limits on government’s use of the new doctrine; it now is updated with the final published version.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 52

Keywords: government speech, public forum, Establishment Clause, Free Speech Clause, Pleasant Grove, Summum, Ten Commandments, Van Orden, endorsement test, monument, religious speech

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: September 3, 2008 ; Last revised: February 23, 2010

Suggested Citation

Dolan, Mary Jean, Why Donated Monuments are Government Speech: The Hard Case of Pleasant Grove City v. Summum. Catholic University Law Review, Vol. 58, No. 1, Fall 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1261294

Contact Information

Mary Jean Dolan (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,184
Downloads: 142
Download Rank: 115,251
Footnotes:  250

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.906 seconds