SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (36)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

What Californians Understand about Privacy Online

Chris Jay Hoofnagle
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology

Jennifer King
Berkeley Center for Law & Technology; University of California, Berkeley - School of Law


September 3, 2008


Abstract:     
The volume of online commerce grows every year, in absence of a federal law setting baseline protections for the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information. Instead, information collected by websites are governed by individual privacy policies.

In order to gauge Californians' understanding of privacy policies and default rules in the online environment, we commissioned a representative survey of adults in the State (N=991). The telephonic survey of Spanish and English speakers was conducted by the Survey Research Center of University of California, Berkeley.

A gulf exists between California consumers' understanding of online rules and common business practices. For instance, Californians who shop online believe that privacy policies prohibit third-party information sharing. A majority of Californians believes that privacy policies create the right to require a website to delete personal information upon request, a general right to sue for damages, a right to be informed of security breaches, a right to assistance if identity theft occurs, and a right to access and correct data.

These findings show that California consumers overvalue the mere fact that a website has a privacy policy, and assume that websites carrying the label have strong, default rules to protect personal data. In a way, consumers interpret "privacy policy" as a quality seal that denotes adherence to some set of standards. Website operators have little incentive to correct this misperception, thus limiting the ability of the market to produce outcomes consistent with consumers' expectations. Drawing upon earlier work, we conclude that because the term "privacy policy" has taken on a specific meaning in the minds of consumers, its use should be limited to contexts where businesses provide a set of protections that meet consumers' expectations.

Keywords: Privacy, market, self-regulation, consumer protection, profiling, opt-in, opt-out

JEL Classifications: D12, D18

Working Paper Series

Date posted: September 03, 2008 ; Last revised: September 03, 2008

Suggested Citation

Hoofnagle, Chris Jay and King, Jennifer, What Californians Understand about Privacy Online (September 3, 2008). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1262130


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Chris Jay Hoofnagle (Contact Author)
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology ( email )
396 Simon Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
HOME PAGE: http://bclt.berkeley.edu
Jennifer King
Berkeley Center for Law & Technology ( email )
Room 355
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law ( email )
Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,622
Downloads: 184
Download Rank: 46,257
Footnotes: 36

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.093 seconds.