Female Investors and Securities Fraud: Is the Reasonable Investor a Woman?
Joan MacLeod Heminway
University of Tennessee College of Law
September 3, 2008
William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law, Vol. 15
University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 77
This paper extends existing scholarship that questions the existing materiality standard used under Rule 10b-5 (and elsewhere in U.S. securities regulation) and its touchstone notion of the reasonable investor. Specifically, the paper asks and answers a seemingly straightforward, yet provocative, question: Is the reasonable investor a woman? The paper then preliminarily explores the potential significance of its key findings - that women and men exhibit different investment behaviors and achieve different investment outcomes, and that the resulting female investor profile is closer to existing conceptions of the reasonable investor than the resulting male investor profile.
As women become larger players in the securities markets, it may be comforting to know that they are relatively well protected by existing conceptions of the reasonable investor. However, the knowledge that women are not completely protected by these existing conceptions and that men are less well protected than women under the current reasonable investor paradigm gives us pause and forces us to reconsider inaction. To that end, this paper continues an ongoing academic and practical conversation about when changes in investor protection should be undertaken and how those changes can best be made if they are to be undertaken - not just for the benefit of women or men, but for the benefit of all underprotected investors.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 47
Keywords: materiality, reasonable investor, female investor, male investor, sex, gender, 10b-5, securities, fraud
JEL Classification: G19, G29, G39, K22, K40, K42
Date posted: September 4, 2008 ; Last revised: January 13, 2015
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.281 seconds